Netwerk Leaks · Investigation File 0034

Not In Our Name - The Network.

In October 2025 a letter landed on Washington desks under the banner of "44 prominent Afrikaners." The byline was inflated by one. The institutional footprint was not. This file audits every name, every affiliation, and the pattern they form when you step back from the page.

Published 25 Oct 2025 Outlet Netwerk24 · News24 Signatories 43 distinct / 44 headlined Status Endorsed by ANC & Presidency
43not 44
Distinct Signatories
Louise du Plessis appears twice under different Lawyers for Human Rights unit titles. The headline rounded up.
14
Tied to One of 4 Universities
NWU, Stellenbosch, UCT, UJ & UP. A tight academic footprint for a letter written "on behalf of Afrikaners."
9
Career Journalists / Editors
Nearly all with Naspers, News24, M-Net or Media24 lineage. Same ecosystem. Different mastheads.
1
Drafter Linked to State Security
AfriForum identified Karen Burger (DIRCO / former SSA) as the letter's coordinator. Civic letter, state hand.
Context · For International Readers

The Letter. The Claim.
The Reality.

What triggered this letter

In early 2025, the Trump administration fast-tracked refugee status for white South Africans, primarily Afrikaners, citing documented farm attacks, race-based employment laws under Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) legislation, and what President Trump described as government-sanctioned targeting of white farmers. This was contested inside the United States and produced an immediate political counter-reaction in South Africa's governing and media establishments.

What this letter argued

Published 23-25 October 2025 under the headline "Not In Our Name: Afrikaners respond to the misuse of their story in US politics," the letter claimed to speak for Afrikaners in rejecting the Trump characterisation. Its core argument: there is no systematic persecution of Afrikaners, the farm attack narrative is exaggerated or fabricated, and the Trump administration was exploiting the Afrikaner story for its own domestic political purposes. The letter was addressed, in effect, to Washington.

Who Afrikaners are

Afrikaners are a South African ethnic group of primarily Dutch, German, and French Huguenot descent whose ancestors settled in the Cape Colony from 1652 onwards. They number roughly 2.7 million people - farmers, miners, engineers, teachers, clergy, small-business owners, and blue-collar workers. Their language, Afrikaans, is the youngest language in the world with its own literature and cultural tradition. Afrikaans-speaking communities predate the United States as a political entity by more than a century. They are not colonial-era administrators who returned to Europe: South Africa is the only home they have ever had.

The political alignment of the signatories

The letter was endorsed by the ANC government within 48 hours of publication. US Senator Chris Coons (Democrat, Delaware, Senate Foreign Relations Committee) was personally briefed on its contents by co-signatory Prof Piet Croucamp before or during publication. The letter was drafted by Karen Burger, an active director in the Department of International Relations and Cooperation whose career spans the National Intelligence Service and the State Security Agency. Its signatories include known progressive commentators with documented records of opposing Trump-era policies. The letter was, in function, an instrument of the foreign policy position held jointly by the ANC government and its aligned Western progressive networks.

Who these 43 are - and who they are not

South Africa's largest Afrikaner representative institutions are unanimous that farm attacks are a serious, documented crisis: the Freedom Front Plus (the third-largest party in the 2024 national election, receiving nearly 500,000 votes), AfriForum (a civil rights organisation with over 350,000 members), and Solidarity (a trade union movement representing over 200,000 workers). None of these organisations was consulted for this letter. None of their members are among the 43 signatories. There is not a single commercial farmer, a single blue-collar worker, or a single rural Afrikaner among them.

The 43 are drawn almost entirely from the progressive Afrikaner institutional class: academics at transformation-aligned universities (14 of 43), journalists from the Naspers-owned media complex, staff and founders of Open Society Foundation-funded NGOs, and politicians with ANC advisory or parliamentary histories. This is a specific and narrow social segment - the professional class whose careers, funding, and institutional standing are embedded in the post-1994 dispensation. Their claim to speak for Afrikaners as a whole is not supported by any democratic mandate, any representative survey, or any consultation with the organisations Afrikaners have themselves built to represent their interests.

What this investigation maps: The signatories are real people with real institutional affiliations, real funding sources, and real political connections - and those connections tell a story the letter did not disclose. The 43 did not emerge spontaneously. The OSF funding pipeline, the DIRCO drafter's career history, the ANC's 48-hour endorsement, and the direct contact with a Senate Democrat Foreign Relations Committee member are all documented. This page audits every name, every affiliation, and every institutional thread. The reader is invited to draw their own conclusions.
Roll-Call · All 43 Named

Every Signatory. Every Affiliation. No Gaps.

The version of this page published earlier showed 18 cards. Readers kept asking the same question: where are the rest? Here are all 43, drawn directly from the canonical list published by News24 on 25 October 2025 and republished by Smile 90.4FM on 27 October. Hover any card for affiliation tags.

The Forty-Three · 43 / 44 headlined

MediaCareer journalists / editors with Naspers, Media24 or OSF-adjacent institutional links.
StatePast or present role in the South African state or government apparatus (NP- or ANC-era).
LHRLawyers for Human Rights - SA's oldest human-rights litigation NGO, founded 1979; OSF, Ford & US State Dept PRM funded.
CoupleMarried signatories who each signed without disclosing the household relationship.
ClergyDutch Reformed Church or broader Protestant clerical office.
BusinessSenior executive, founder or board role in a listed or privately-held SA firm.
AcademicProfessor, emeritus professor, research fellow or university senior management.

Why 43, but marketed as 44

The News24 publication of 25 October 2025 lists Louise du Plessis of Lawyers for Human Rights twice - once with her Strategic Litigation portfolio, once with her Land & Housing Unit portfolio. Every downstream outlet, the ANC endorsement statement, and Presidency social media amplified the figure as "44 Afrikaners." The discrepancy is not a typographical rounding. It is a presentation choice that inflated the headline number by one.

Finding · State Hand

The Laundered Letter.

A Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) application was filed in December 2025 seeking confirmation of whether the State Security Agency (SSA) and the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) were funding journalists to run coordinated narrative campaigns. The government's 30-day statutory response window elapsed with no reply.

The letter's drafter - Karen Burger - is a director in the DIRCO Director-General's office. Her career spans the National Intelligence Service, the State Security Agency, the South African Embassy in Washington DC (Political Counsellor through end 2024), and DIRCO. The ANC government endorsed the letter within 48 hours. Three career DIRCO diplomats sit among the 43 signatories.

The philanthropic backbone runs from George Soros personally financing the 1987 Dakar Conference - the origin event that produced Max du Preez and Vrye Weekblad - through the Open Society Foundation for South Africa (documented $230 million-plus over 30 years) to the $29 million Constitutionalism Fund (OSF, Ford Foundation and Atlantic Philanthropies combined), which funds Lawyers for Human Rights, whose founder, former national director, and current staff all signed the letter.

Anatomy · Composition

Who Are These Forty-Three, Really?

A letter asserts a right to speak for a community. The first question any reader is entitled to ask is whether the signers resemble the community they claim. Below, the 43 broken down by sector, by institution, and by the networks they share.

Sector Composition

Primary professional domain · n=43
Academic · 18 Media · 9 Clergy (DRC) · 4 Legal · 4 Business · 4 Writer · 3 Consultant · 3 43 DISTINCT · SIGNATORIES

Institutional Concentration

University & newsroom clusters · top nodes

Fourteen of the forty-three hold posts at just five universities. Add the Naspers / News24 / M-Net newsroom lineage and more than half the letter traces to a single overlapping ecosystem of employers.

The Institutional Map - Full Cut

Every institution represented by at least one signatory
Network · Overlap Mapping

Four Nodes Hold the Letter Together.

A 43-signatory letter can look like diverse civic consensus - until you plot the institutional lines between the names. Four hubs account for nearly two thirds of the roster: North-West University, Stellenbosch, the Naspers media complex, and Lawyers for Human Rights. Everything else clusters around the edges.

Investigative Board · 3D Network

The Interactive Intelligence Board.

Each sphere is an actor. Each thread is a documented institutional, funding or state connection. Drag to rotate. Scroll to zoom. Click any signatory node to open their file. This is the same roster you have just read above - now seen from above.

Drag · Scroll · Click any sphere
Signatory
Media
Institution
Funder
State
Historic
Provenance · Primary Sources

Where Every Name Came From.

Canonical Source List

Primary: "Not in our name: Afrikaners respond to the misuse of their story in US politics" - News24 opinion desk, published 25 October 2025. First release appeared on Netwerk24 on 23 October 2025. The News24 publication is the version the African National Congress endorsed on 25 October and that Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya amplified on the same day.

Mirror: Smile 90.4FM, 27 October 2025 - "ANC welcomes 'Not In Our Name' stance by group of Afrikaners." Reproduces the full co-signatory list verbatim.

Duplicate name documented by: News24 masthead of the letter itself; confirmed by Smile 90.4FM roll-call, in which Louise du Plessis, Lawyers for Human Rights appears in the 8th and 10th entries.

Drafter attribution: AfriForum public statement, November 2025, naming Karen Burger - currently at the Department of International Relations and Cooperation, formerly of the State Security Agency - as the coordinator of the open letter and the figure who approached several potential signatories. France 24 (16 November 2025) confirmed a government employee was involved, framing her role as personal capacity; AfriForum disputes that framing.

Independent attestation of initiator: Prof Piet Croucamp on the record to FRANCE 24 describing himself as "one of the main initiators" and confirming direct outreach to US Senator Chris Coons.